Readers of SWHT and Nexus will recall that I go into considerable detail on operation TILT.  There are a number reasons for that, one being that TILT may be one of the most solid instances of “rogue” CIA activity at a senior officer level.   Its not hard to find individual officers going beyond their orders or even directly disobeying orders – Rip Robertson sinking a ship he was ordered not to attack or going ashore at the Bay of Pigs against direct orders.  Paramilitary action officers tend to be action oriented, that’s what makes them what they are.

But with TILT, we have something far beyond that, an action directly against Administration policy and against Presidential directives of the time – very specifically a directive to shut down independent operations of exile groups such as Alpha 66. On a side note, we now know separately that JM/WAVE  – Shackley and Morales – had advance knowledge of certain Alpha 66 operations and chose not to block them, a sort of passive disobedience of orders.   But TILT went way beyond that.

For those who have not read SWHT or Nexus, a very broad brush picture of the operation involves certain exile connected figures (John Martino chief among them) gaining the attention of first Senator James Eastland (head of the Senate Internal Affairs Committee) and of William Pawley.   Pawley in turn took a story to JM/WAVE chief Shackley and then on to one of his close personal friends, Marshall Carter (Deputy Director of the CIA).  Pawley himself was also personally close to J.C. King, the long time head of Western Hemisphere CIA operations and had worked with Pawley on both the Guatemala project and in an effort to preserve Batista in Cuba. Indeed Pawley had been close to both President’s Truman and Eisenhower – but was an outspoken critic in speeches and media articles of President Kennedy.

To make a long story short, in the end Pawley committed his own personal yacht to a mission into Cuba, one in which a team of Alpha 66 fighters (led by highly visible media figure Eddie Bayo) would to on shore to extract Russian officers who would then be returned to expose the continuing existence of Russian missiles and nuclear weapons inside Cuba. The mission would receive full CIA support including participation by key field personnel such as Rip Robertson and would be backed up by contract transport aircraft and by radar shadowing from one of the two highly covert CIA mother ships operating missions against Cuba.

The mission itself violated a host of approvals and security rules – one of the most critical being not only that non- Agency cleared exiles comprised the team but that a LIFE photographer was assigned to photograph all elements of the mission and that his photos were never recovered after the fact…..and they included photos of operational CIA personnel.  That was a fantastic security violation, but one approved by Carter and allowed to stand by both Shackley and Morales.

OK, so none of this is new to readers of my books – but my new work on deniable warfare has made me aware of just how great a risk was being taken by the personal participation of William Pawley on the mission.  These days Pawley is most often mentioned for his work with the WWII Flying Tigers in China, for his business connections in Cuba or for his Latin American ambassadorships.

But – William Pawley was far more than that. For example in 1954 he was selected by President Eisenhower as one of only five men to do a complete assessment of the entire American intelligence system – not just CIA but all the military intelligence groups. The Committees report was Presidential eyes only and contained recommendations that would structure the American intelligence effort for at least a decade.  Pawley himself was designated as a secret representative from Eisenhower and the CIA to Batista before the Castro revolution.  In short, because of his service and his friendships, Pawley would have been a major window into the entire American intelligence community and its activities through the Bay of Pigs.  Yet Pawley was not only allowed to take the TILT mission into Cuban waters but given major CIA support to do so.  Beyond the PR impact of his capture or death, surely someone had to have thought about how much of a prize he would be not only to Castro but to the KGB….in the event of his capture and identification, the Russians might well have managed to ensure he was never seen again by anyone except their interrogators.

What would justify such a risk?   Well if the mission had succeeded, arrangements were in place for the Russians to be debriefed but turned over to Eastland’s committee.  A combination of Eastland and Luce (at LIFE magazine) would have made a political firestorm for JFK.  Certainly there would have been calls for his impeachment for being conned by the Russians and Soviets; even if that had not happened, his 1964 campaign would have been derailed over Cuba and national security.  And no doubt there would have been new calls for an invasion of Cuba.

All of which probably explains why JFK, RFK, the Special Group authorizing all covert missions into Cuba appear not to have been told about TILT.  Indeed the new CIA Cuban affairs head Desmond Fitzgerald only shows up copied on memos after the fact – and we have no idea whether or not he truly knew.  Its hard to imagine him not telling JFK then if he did; if he didn’t….well that’s another story.

A search continues to see if we can determine how far up the approvals chain TILT was really visible, even within CIA.  It seems worth the effort given the credentials of the people involved and the rather obvious conclusion that the mission was at its core, even if a long shot, an effort to undermine the President, block his re-election and very possible reignite the call for invading Cuba. It is probably not overstating the case to view TILT as a verifiable instance of domestic American regime change (well at least attempted regime change).



About Larry Hancock

Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of November Patriots and author of the 2003 research analysis publication titled also Someone Would Have Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several document collections addressing the 112th Army Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case. In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell Legacy Award for his contributions of documents released under the JFK Act.

4 responses »

  1. Alan Kent says:

    Important exploration, Larry. The contextualization of Pawley’s participation in “Tilt” highlights the importance of this anti-Kennedy effort. In the (wonderful) book “Sons and Brothers,” Richard Mahoney observes that the outline of this mission ties into the disinformation tale Johnny Rosselli would later tell about JFK being assassinated by anti-Castro-ites who had been captured by Castro’s forces, turned, and eventually re-deployed to Dallas. Mahoney hints at the possibility that “Tilt” may have had multiple purposes – one of them being to set up the contingency plan of a post-JFK assassination disinfo campaign. Given the stories told by Rosselli and Martino particularly, it’s an interesting and provocative thought. A stretch, no doubt – we don’t need this scenario to explain the perceived importance of “Tilt” to its planners. But, I’d still be very interested to know, for example, whether Eddie Bayo survived the mission, and what he was doing later in ’63.

    • Hi Alan, as to Bayo and survival, we can’t know for sure but reading Robertson’s post mission debriefs is informative. For example
      he mentions that none of the Alpha team seemed interested in their exfiltration instructions and showed no real interest
      in the instructions for contacts onshore. Beyond that, they went in with way too many people in the boat and with way
      too many heavy weapons – clearly the boat was overloaded and the whole thing has no appearance of a covert pick up
      mission. Neither Robertson nor Pawley seem to have wondered about that too much at the time though. Bill Turner says that in 1995
      Cuban security chief Escalante told him that was found swamped near Baracoa but with no sign of any occupants.

      Given the importance of the mission, Robertson and Eugenio Martinez, both vets of an immense number of Cuban infiltrations
      seem not to have involved themselves very much and neither went in with the team – rather unusual given the purported
      importance of the pick up and the fact that the Agency even sent a Russian speaking case officer in with the mission so
      that the purported defectors could be debriefed in real time.

  2. Alan Kent says:

    Fascinating…The possibility presents itself that the big names involved with the mission may have been used for another scheme. Possibly an anti-JFK plan that operated on multiple levels…

  3. andy b says:

    A 1964 ad for John Martino speaking about his experiences.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s