I’ve posted here previously on Red Bird and recently Jim DiEugenio invited me to prepare a short summary paper on certain of the leads and issues pertaining to events reported there.  Debra Conway was nice enough to add some illustrations for those who may not easily visualize the airport’s location.  I won’t repeat anything from it here but if you wish to take a look you can find it on the CTKA web site.

http://www.ctka.net/2013/Hancock_Redbird.html

I also want to note credit to all of  Matthew Smith’s primary work on Red Bird issues, with Wayne January. Fortunately I’ve  had a number of occasions to discuss it with Matthew, both in Dallas at Lancer conferences and by phone and email.  He has always been most generous in sharing information.

Addendum:

It’s been brought to my attention that I left something out of the article that certainly deserves mention so I’ll note it here.  I do mention that the FBI learned about Ray January from a local source, he did not go to them with  his story (either one of them).  They became aware of it because after mentioning a visit by people wishing to rent an air plane for a flight to Mexico to some friends, the story was actually picked up in a news item on UPI.  The FBI became aware of January from that.  The issue with the UPI article is that it gives the date of the visit to the airport as summer, not immediately before the assassination.  That is the same date that shows up in the FBI report on January.  January himself, when shown his report, stated that the visit had been only days before the assassination, not months before – which puts him at odds with both the UPI story and the date in the FBI report and that disconnect raises issues about his credibility as a witness.  Unfortunately, it is not FBI practice to collect first hand written statements from witnesses nor to have them review and sign off on the FBI reports themselves (which are sometimes a consolidation of various information).   So did the FBI get it wrong?   Did January get it wrong (and why would he introduce an issue which would hurt his own credibility he he was not sincere about getting the story right?).   Did the FBI change the date on purpose?  Or could it be something as simple as they writing a report which used the date from their initial information, the UPI story?    Problem is we will never know for sure – but it is important to have all elements of the story in place for everyone to reach their own conclusions.  Thanks to Greg Parker for keeping me straight..   Larry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— Larry

Advertisements

About Larry Hancock

Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of November Patriots and author of the 2003 research analysis publication titled also Someone Would Have Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several document collections addressing the 112th Army Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case. In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell Legacy Award for his contributions of documents released under the JFK Act.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s