I’ve posted on Congressional oversight previously, including remarks about what I think it would take to enable objective investigations of crimes or malfeasance involving agencies or government employees – the current approaches just don’t work, for a great many reasons.  So I’m not going to bore with that again.  However David’s comment about oversight and transparency led me to think of some of the things I’m writing about in my next work, tentatively named “Surprise Attack”.

At present both the military and all major federal agencies do have a variety of internal oversight tools.  One level are the organization’s Inspectors General; they are chartered to look at practices and evaluate major performance problems and operational failures.  At another level  you have the GAO, which is more of an efficiency and spending tracking effort.  In spite of what is often said about government, both groups do some outstanding work.  As an example, the CIA’s Inspector General report on the Bay of Pigs was both cutting and highly accurate. Yet even though the report went on the record, the head of the clandestine directorate was allowed to oppose it and the CIA’ s Director essentially shoved it aside and let a counter report go into the record.  As a result, officers which had proved to be largely incompetent in both security and military practices were not disciplined and allowed to pursue similar operations in the future. The fact that the Agency in general refused to recognize its incompetence in large scale military operations led to officers being sent from JMWAVE to Laos and organizing military operations which were equally outrageous.  We go into that in Shadow Warfare.

But stepping forward in time, following the attacks of 9/11, the CIA’s Inspector General, the TSA/FFA’s Inspector General both performed solid studies, reported out points deserving of further investigation and probable disciplinary action – and the heads of both Agencies simply shoved it under the rug, refusing to pursue the IG reports.   Actually a number of GAO studies of the FBI both before and following 9/11 pointed out problems as well and the FBI stonewalled the GAO report.  It would be great to see a real history graduate student study the extent to which IG and GAO reports are ever really acted on.   Unfortunately in regard to 9/11, both NORAD and the FBI should also have had internal investigations but that’s another story entirely – and I do write about that.

Along those same lines, the GAO did excellent work in pointing out a large amount of malfeasance in Iraq and Afghanistan contracting and as far as I can tell nobody ever got prosecuted.  The Iraq scandals appear to have been far and above anything we saw in Vietnam yet the amount of investigate reporting to date has been pitiful  – is it me or does this just seem to happen whenever the Texans get into Washington?  Probably just me, it happens in a lot of administrations but the the scale seems to be different….

Back to my point, which is that actually some very good oversight is done inside government, but it has no teeth since the upper echelon can ignore it.   I would propose something equivalent to in independent Federal Attorney General’s office the IG and GAO reports and evaluates them for charges – it can’t be done in DOJ because Attorney’s General and their staffs clearly suck up (sorry) way to much to the President’s who appoint them.  I’ve noticed it was not always that day, as recently as the Eisenhower administration the AG would give president’s opinions which opposed their pending policies and just flat tell them it was illegal and it stopped there…..that just doesn’t happen much these days.

…….I ran across the following article today and felt that this post had to be updated to include it.  The article discusses the systems in place and some of the horrible failures in oversight related to military contracting and procurement.   In examining agency oversight is has to be acknowledged that human greed is an endemic factor that is sometimes hard to comprehend and often single individuals manage to compromise even well designed systems.  Its pretty depressing but if you have a strong stomach – read on:

View story at Medium.com










About Larry Hancock

Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of November Patriots and author of the 2003 research analysis publication titled also Someone Would Have Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several document collections addressing the 112th Army Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case. In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell Legacy Award for his contributions of documents released under the JFK Act.

3 responses »

  1. Jim Stubbs says:

    I agree on the oversight. Law enforcement has internal affairs departments that are active but somewhat limited due to size. A large oversight organization would have have enough power to make their invstigations and conclusions stick. The problem is the old one of empire building and goal displacement. Management and oversight have to work together. Given the “ethics” of so many in the upper reaches of government today, I’m not sure I’d trust people to not grossly abuse such power.

  2. David Brown says:

    1. Justice Department should be an independent Fourth Branch
    2. Attorney General appointed by Congress responsible to the people, the Congress and the Constitution
    3. Permanent independent Special Prosecutor reporting to attorney general
    4. Plenary jurisdiction at attorney General’s discretion
    5. 24/7 preservation of entire Federal record
    6. Only attorney General can classify records and then only for a maximum of three years
    7. Otherwise entire record is disclosed in readily available formats without charge to the public

    • For those who have already read the post on Oversight, I’d recommend you take a look at the update I just posted which contains a link to a current story you will not find in the mainstream media sidelines. Considering what political and entertainment pap does make those headlines, the absence of reporting like this is really sad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s