On November 22, 1963, as soon as news of the shooting began to spread, in Dallas, in Texas and in many other places the immediate thought – and deep concern – was that individuals from the ultra-right would be found to have been behind the attack. To a large extent that was driven by the extreme amount of publicly visible right wing hate associated with Dallas itself.

 

Adlai Stevenson, American ambassador to the UN had been physically assaulted during an earlier visit to Dallas. The Vice President and his wife had been chased down the street in Dallas, fleeing from violent right wing women protesters. The situation was so dire that Texas Congressmen had advised JFK not to come and the Dallas Chief of Police had gone on television to plead for calm and call for individuals to support efforts to deal with the anticipated violence. Law enforcement had also very quietly called in press and others familiar with recent protests and prepared photo books, performing special recognition training for the security personnel assigned to the Trade Center, location of the President’s luncheon address.

 

It’s something that a great deal used to be written about, not so much anymore. I dealt with it at length in November Patriots, a book I did with former Dallas reporter Connie Kritzberg. The Mayor and Dallas City Council even went so far as to pass a special ordinance addressing the dangers and Chief of Police Curry underlined it by a public call endorsing citizen’s arrest if law enforcement was not adequate to deal with any threat.

 

In that context, and with public expressions of opposition and literal hate from right wing elements, it’s natural that first thoughts were of the ultra-right. But with so much right wing hate, who would it actually come immediately to mind?  Leading right wing media advocates such as Bunker Hunt and his family had spoken bitterly against JFK, we have a good deal of anecdotal evidence that they had even offered reward money for his death.  The FBI and Secret Service both had registered threats from some of the more violent elements of the right wing – generally traceable to groups affiliated either with the National States Rights Party or the Minutemen. In his first order after the assassination, FBI Director Hoover directed proactive contact with any and all FBI contacts and informants – including those connected to the ultra-right. Of course that order was rescinded within less than 24 hours.

 

In The Awful Grace of God Stu Wexler and I write about FBI reports on rifle teams actually being trained to shoot JFK and others, there was even a Secret Service alert out of San Antonio regarding a possible NSRP planned attack during JFK’s visit to Texas.  A recent warning out of Miami from an FBI source had described a sniper attack from a high building during a motorcade. But due to Secret Service protocols, since Washington had been mentioned in that report, the warning was sent to DC but not passed on to the Secret Service security team doing the Dallas trip.

 

Of course there were highly visible public voices speaking out against JFK from the right. In Texas and nationally some of the most prominent included H. L. Hunt and his family as well as , former General Edwin Walker –  outspoken against not only JFK’s policies but against integration and the civil rights movement in general. Walker was virulently anti-Communist, seeing the communist party behind the civil rights movement and threatening the nation’s Christian religious foundation. He was politically active, having run for Governor of Texas (supported by Hunt oil money), but in 1963 seemed to be more concerned about difficulties in fund raising than anything else. He had most recently joined fundamentalist preacher Billy Hargis in a national appearance tour touting the Communist threat and calling for military action against Cuba.

 

And those were just a few of the names and groups on people’s minds. The Minutemen, the NSRP, the Hunt family, Edwin Walker – of course it could have been a simple matter of radical locals, taking their guns to the Plaza and putting talk into action. While we can’t trace all that, we can take a look at what went on with the most suspect groups, with Hunt, with Walker and see if that suggests either actual involvement or at least a guilty conscious. I’ll make an effort to do that in Part 2.

Advertisements

About Larry Hancock

Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of November Patriots and author of the 2003 research analysis publication titled also Someone Would Have Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several document collections addressing the 112th Army Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case. In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell Legacy Award for his contributions of documents released under the JFK Act.

7 responses »

  1. Carter Dary says:

    Hi Larry, I’d like to discuss Trump and Trumpism with you soon. If you’d like to discuss, please send a reply.

    Carter

    • Happy to do so Carter, if you want to set up a time just drop me an email at larryjoe@westok.net

      Just be advised, I can only take so much Trumpism in one setting, especially if it relates to his current geopolitical tweets and abysmal lack of knowledge of national security issues. Strangely enough he does have a couple of people who could advise himself on such things but he appears not even to talk to him. The thought of a President elect talking about Russia and NATO without even having spoken to his SecState or SecDefense appointees in regard to his public comments is breath taking…and not in a good way.

  2. Marv Kramer says:

    Hi Larry, As you know all of this is of the utmost importance right now especially with regard to the activities of the Hunt family, including Bunker Hunt’s close relationship with Gordon McLendon. Bunker Hunt was called to identify McLendon’s body after he committed suicide in the late 80’s. As you know I was General Counsel of the McLendon Corporation. The fact that Gordon committed suicide was covered up by his son, Bart.

    The McLendon/Hunt relationship is the “ground zero” of the extreme right-wing movement that will accelerate exponentially after the inauguration of Donald Trump as President. It’s vitally important to understand the modus operandi of the two, especially knowing the state of McLendon’s mental condition through the years.

    All of this has much to do with what Carter just posted: Trump and Trumpism.

    Marv

    • Marv, I follow your point but I’m afraid my comments are going to have to be relatively broad and limited in these blog posts because I will be covering a good deal of ground in a limited amount of room. If you would like to share detailed information on this area please email me and I could propose a presentation on it at next falls Lancer Conference. I’m just very limited in what I can explore here. As another suggestion, have you thought about participating in the JFK Education forum? There have been and are some threads that would be very much in line with Hunt and McLendon. My email is larryjoe@westok.net

  3. Matt says:

    I like what you’re up to here with this ‘Afterwards’ series, Larry. You have always been good at applying sound organizing principles to often dizzying narratives (and counter narratives). Was going back through Surprise Attack this morning where this quality is on full display.

    • Thanks Matt, much appreciated. I admit that its a bit less sensational than some other approaches but I’ve found that looking around the corners at these sorts of topics can get pretty interesting. That was particularly true in Surprise Attack where digging inside the actual chains of command during various crises provided some insights you don’t necessarily get otherwise.

      This “afterwards” approach is sort of like the old “returning to the scene of the crime” routine from criminal investigation…which of course got to be a “thing” because there was some truth to it. What makes it a bit harder in this instance is that clearly a number of various individuals/groups wanted to see JFK dead, talked about it, even in some instances did more than that and encouraged people to seriously consider violence.

      And immediately afterwards some were not really sure how closely they might have been connect to the act of murder….which in some cases led to bragging, others to ducking heads and running and in others something entirely different. It will take a few posts to wade through all that at even a high level.

  4. […] Afterwards – Ultra Right Part 1 by Larry Hancock. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s