While Deb prepares her next post in her series on internet  political warfare, I’m continuing to slog on with the development of two new monographs. I’ve also been working with Bill Simpich on the “crypt busting” exercise several of us are engaged in to add to the Mary Ferrell CIA crypt data.


Most recently we wrestled with Operation 40 – which while a CIA operation in support of the Cuba project, did not carry its own unique crypt. On the other hand, a variety of Cuban exile personnel recruited for the project did participate and crypts such as AMMOT, AMFAST and possibly even AMCHEER can be related to that operation.

Matters are further complicated due to the fact that certain of those personnel continued service with the CIA following the disaster at the Bay of Pigs.  In particular the AMOT personnel show up in the Cuban Intelligence service later established at JMWAVE and some AMOT’s were even assigned to work at a secondary station in Mexico City – a “virtual station” compartmentalized from the regular CIA station within the American embassy in the city.

If that were not confusing enough, there were undercurrents of secondary agendas within Operation 40 even during the formation of the Cuban Brigade. And in later years certain Operation 40 personnel went their own ways, becoming involved in drug smuggling and apparently in a certain amount of extortion and blackmail within the Cuban exile community – reportedly using stolen or copied personnel files assembled from counter intelligence activities performed in advance of the landings.

Officially the Operation 40 mission of the Brigade intelligence and security personal was to be assisting the consolidation and administration of liberated areas while neutralizing local communists, Castro regime cadre and other potential threats to a new civil government. In line with that mission “black lists” were developed in advance of the landings, identifying individuals of all stripes considered to be a threat.

However even before the Brigade left on its mission, rumors were circulating that leftists or socialist exile fighters and leaders were also to be neutralized (read imprisoned or executed) during the invasion. That concern was exacerbated by a series of training camp confrontations and conflicts between Brigade personnel.

All of which leaves us with an officially identifiable mission for Operation 40 but apparently some very real contemporary concerns that there were secondary intentions among some of its personnel, possibly even endorsed by certain of its CIA trainers and paramilitary advisors.

As the actual landings unraveled on the beaches, the majority of the personnel intended for the operation were unable to land and were returned to Florida. Some continued on in JMWAVE maritime missions, some were taken into the new JM/WAVE Cuban Intelligence Service supporting the ongoing Cuba projects and others ended up going their own ways.

Over the years certain of those “others” would add to the confusion and “Operation 40” began to be used by some writers as a generic term for all sorts of illegal and questionable acts by Cuban exiles, extending well through the 1960s and even the 1970’s.

Beyond Operation 40 and crypt work, for those interested, another of my recent interviews is now available on the internet.  It was a good, solid interview covering questions in regard to both the JFK and MLK assassinations.



2 responses »

  1. Matt says:

    Just got Creating Chaos! Excited to dig into it.
    By the way, your book covers have come a long way!

    That crypt worksheet is incredible…

    Keep up the good work

    • larryjoe2 says:

      Hi Matthew, I’ll look forward to chatting about Creating Chaos! And yes, I think the covers have come a long way, but I’ve been even more pleased with both the end note and index sections in the more recent books. Its really a challenge to make “readable” endnotes when they are as dense as mine get to be, especially with the huge number of links that you find in Creating Chaos.

      When I think back to how little we knew in trying to deal with CIA documents in particular in the earlier days its sort of mind boggling. I just looked at a crypt and acronym list that the ARRB prepared to support its own work and its minimal compared to what we have learned. Now that we have crypts and aliases for both individuals and locations, the documents have become far more meaningful.

      I think that will really show up in the Wheaton names that we are working on now, it brings a level of detail that would have been impossible even four or five years ago.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s